QUOTE({DaRk} @ Apr 11 2006, 12:42 AM)

Fw-190 was actually a better plane than the Spitfire, it came too late and in too little numbers to actually affect the course of the war.
The FW-190 was superb, but I think later variants of the Spitfire were able to match, then exceed it. The FW-190 was actually made in pretty large numbers, but it was already over at that point, for every FW-190 Germany made, the US made 10 planes, Britain 2, Russia 5, PLUS they had the gas and pilots to fly them.
QUOTE(21cwDave @ Mar 13 2007, 12:06 AM)

just put it this way when the f-22 was escorted by 2 f-15 fighters the f-22 pilot said alright boys lets put it into afterburner, the response of the 2 f-15 pilots were "we are already at full afterburner". That my fellow aviation pals is what we call super cruise going supersonic without afterburner, and you can thank that to Pratt & Whitney leaders in making dependable engines since the start of flight. When the f-22 pilot did put it into full afterburner he said goodbye to the other pilots and left them in his exhaust.
I don't believe this one. The F-15 is capable of Mach 2.5, the SR-71 Mach 3.2. Sure the F-22 can supercruise, but so can an F-16 in clean config (no wing stores GE engine) I'd guess there is no reason the F-22 can't exceed mach 2 on dry thrust since Concorde could do it, but it would surprise me if it's speed is not limited by stealth requirements (air intake config etc...)