Home





Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> L-1011 Engine Modification?
TWA727
post Oct 11 2006, 05:03 PM
Post #1


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,204
Joined: 28-July 05
From: KIAD, KDCA, KBWI
Member No.: 1,859



Hello everyone,

I am here to annoy you once again! Muwahahaha!

While surfing airliners.net for pictures of the L-1011, I noticed a small difference in some Delta Air Lines L-1011's. There appears to be an "extension" of sorts of the cone of the engine. Here's an example:

Delta L-1011 modified

and in this picture, taken earlier this year, there is no modification:

Unmodified L-1011 engine

I do know that Delta had some range-enhancements done on the L-1011 which entailed fitting the -500 series' engines, but still, the -500 does not have this "extended tailcone."

L1011-500

Any insight would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Empress
post Oct 11 2006, 05:36 PM
Post #2


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 569
Joined: 16-May 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 1,529



The engines on the very early model Tristars had an even longer "hot section" fitted. It was shown through tests though, that they offered no performance gains, so a redesigned shorter "hot section" covering was installed, and early models were retrofitted with the samller and lighter units.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TWA727
post Oct 11 2006, 05:40 PM
Post #3


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,204
Joined: 28-July 05
From: KIAD, KDCA, KBWI
Member No.: 1,859



QUOTE(Empress @ Oct 11 2006, 09:36 PM) [snapback]105902[/snapback]
The engines on the very early model Tristars had an even longer "hot section" fitted. It was shown through tests though, that they offered no performance gains, so a redesigned shorter "hot section" covering was installed, and early models were retrofitted with the samller and lighter units.


Thanks a lot Empress, I knew it would be something incrediby simple. I knew that something was not right, but I knew that it would be a simple explanation from someone else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmd747
post Oct 17 2006, 12:58 AM
Post #4


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 780
Joined: 1-October 05
From: KORD
Member No.: 2,206



QUOTE(TWA727 @ Oct 11 2006, 04:40 PM) [snapback]105904[/snapback]
Thanks a lot Empress, I knew it would be something incrediby simple. I knew that something was not right, but I knew that it would be a simple explanation from someone else.

Similar things happened with the 747, through different variants.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CS-TMX
post Feb 14 2007, 12:38 AM
Post #5


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 10-March 05
From: Lisboa
Member No.: 1,028



In the beginning, the L-1011, beside the normal cascade vanes reverse for the by-pass stream, had also clamshells for the reverse of the hot stream. That's why the hotstream cone was longer.

It's quite difficult to see the clamshalls in this picture, but they are there and opened.
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9496/reverseil5.jpg

Also see these pictures:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0374849/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0640580/L/

This post has been edited by CS-TMX: Feb 14 2007, 12:40 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

 
 
Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 11:50 PM

Home | Webmail | Forum | Random Video Generator | Link to us | Aircraft Fact Sheets | Help
Upload videos | Become a videographer | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact us | About Flightlevel350.com | Ad Choices

© 2004 - 2009 Flightlevel350.com
Aviation Videos - Airplane Videos - Loudest place on the web!