Home





Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What Is The Descent Rate To Be Weightless?
colinboyd
post Aug 13 2006, 08:13 AM
Post #1


Saab 340 Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 20-March 05
From: Northern Ireland
Member No.: 1,084



What is the exact descent rate so that you are weightless? Not so that you are pinned to the roof, but weightless.

We've all seen footage of people inside cargo planes, messing around whilst weightless.

Has anyone experienced being weightless?
I have heard of people getting a trip up in an RAF Puma & the loadmaster spinning around the centre pole in the back whilst weightless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
galaxy
post Aug 13 2006, 08:48 AM
Post #2


Hominidae member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 2,257
Joined: 11-December 04
From: Zandhoven(OBL/EBZR),Belgium
Member No.: 349



QUOTE(colinboyd @ Aug 13 2006, 02:13 PM) [snapback]98842[/snapback]
What is the exact descent rate so that you are weightless?


Zero G-force is the only factor you need to have.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_g
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glnflwrs
post Aug 13 2006, 11:49 AM
Post #3


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 2,846
Joined: 5-June 05
From: Hesperia, CA USA (L26)
Member No.: 1,610



See this for a complete definition.....


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cobzz
post Aug 14 2006, 02:25 AM
Post #4


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 7-July 05
Member No.: 1,765



Raise you're hand, then let it fall.

The moments you let if fall, it is in Zero G, however once it stops accelerating (going down), it won't be in Zero G anymore.

Oh and yeah I've been in zero G before. In a Cessna 172 we pitched up to 15degrees nose up then we pushed nose forward.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doug J
post Aug 14 2006, 09:56 PM
Post #5


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 15-April 06
Member No.: 3,715



QUOTE(cobzz @ Aug 14 2006, 02:25 AM) [snapback]98988[/snapback]
Raise you're hand, then let it fall.

The moments you let if fall, it is in Zero G, however once it stops accelerating (going down), it won't be in Zero G anymore.

Oh and yeah I've been in zero G before. In a Cessna 172 we pitched up to 15degrees nose up then we pushed nose forward.



Any airplane will do weightless zero G maneuvers. A J3 will and a B747 will. Try not to do it in a plane with a head or it will get messy. No stress on the airplane and floating around in the cabin is a lot of fun. It doesn't last long or you have to deal with a dive which coulld cause stress. Do it once or twice to get the thrill then go on to more productive ventures. My favorite was in a D18 twin beach with friends in back. Lots of room to float around for a few seconds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Archangel
post Aug 14 2006, 11:31 PM
Post #6


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,047
Joined: 8-December 04
From: McChord AFB 62 AW
Member No.: 333



Alot of it has to do with rate of change. Think of it this way, if you slowly pitch down it doesnt matter how fast you fall you wont become weightless. However if it is somewhat abrupt you will experience zero or negative g's. Its a good thing speed isnt the only factor in gravity, because if it was you would die from flying in a commercial jet. Excess g's are one thing that keeps space travel from becoming efficent even if we can go fast enough. The reason is if you were to accelerate to lets say 200,000mph you would have to do it over a long time period or you would be crushed to death with the g-load. Imagine how long it would take if you could accelerate to light speed in a way that would not kill you.

Ive talked to some C-17 loadmasters and they say you don't go weightless in combat decents because the pilots don't just force the nose down immediatly but let it come down at a reasonable rate, and even at more than 10,000fpm decent you could walk around(not recommended).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cobzz
post Aug 15 2006, 02:29 AM
Post #7


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 7-July 05
Member No.: 1,765



10000feet decent rate is pretty fast icon_razz.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TAL1440
post Aug 15 2006, 03:49 AM
Post #8


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 7-August 05
Member No.: 1,894



QUOTE(Archangel @ Aug 14 2006, 08:31 PM) [snapback]99166[/snapback]
The reason is if you were to accelerate to lets say 200,000mph you would have to do it over a long time period or you would be crushed to death with the g-load. Imagine how long it would take if you could accelerate to light speed in a way that would not kill you.



Yeah I read somewhere 20G's will make you bleed from the ears then you will die upon reaching 40.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charliepapa
post Aug 15 2006, 04:50 AM
Post #9


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 716
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 2,779



You'll die about 10 G. Most people pass out at around 9, so if your unconcious you wont be doing your special breathing techniques... so yeah. Yead die. Just to add.. doing 5 G blinking hurts (from experience). I don't know how someone could go all the way up to 9.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Odyssey2001ACC
post Aug 15 2006, 09:51 AM
Post #10


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 120
Joined: 26-February 05
From: USA
Member No.: 899



On the planet Earth, acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 meters per second per second. What this means is that if you jump off of a bridge (in a vacuum) by the end of the first second you will be traveling 9.8 meters per second, at the end of the second second you will be traveling 19.6 meters per second and so on (exponential growth).. To achieve this in an aircraft it is necessary for the aircraft's descent rate to equal that of gravity (accelerating descent rate). While it is possible to do so by simply nosing over and diving it is possible to sustain the weightlessness much longer by climbing steeply prior to nosing over, doing this causes you to have a positive velocity (altitude above earth increasing) prior to actually being pulled towards Earth. You can think of it as being shot out of a cannon except you are enclosed inside of a tube traveling at your exact same speed and trajectory.
The flight path of an aircraft creating an optimum zero g environment will form a parabola which mathematically speaking is a graph defined by an exponential function simply put y=x^2 or in this case y=-9.8x^2 where x is time in seconds and y is distance traveled.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Archangel
post Aug 15 2006, 07:43 PM
Post #11


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,047
Joined: 8-December 04
From: McChord AFB 62 AW
Member No.: 333



QUOTE(charliepapa @ Aug 15 2006, 01:50 AM) [snapback]99181[/snapback]
You'll die about 10 G. Most people pass out at around 9, so if your unconcious you wont be doing your special breathing techniques... so yeah. Yead die. Just to add.. doing 5 G blinking hurts (from experience). I don't know how someone could go all the way up to 9.



No 10 g's wont kill you. Maybe you should do some reasearch. There have been people who sustained 13 g's in centrifuges. Not only that a crash in nascar can generate 80-100 g's and plenty of people survive that. What affect g's have on your is directly related to how long your being affected by them. You may easily survive 100 g's for 1/00 of a second but easily die at 20 for 10 seconds. It's also a factor of negative vs positive. Positive g's won't usually kill you because its just a lack of oxygen to your brain that causes you to pass out, which is where the death from g's comes from. That is until you get to an amount that causes bodily damage, then the death comes from internal and external damage.

Now when it comes to negative g's its much easier to die because blood is rushing to your brain and blood vessesls will pop quite easily with anything over 7 negative g's if its sustained. I'd say 10 negative would kill most people.

Now the anti G-strain techniqe does give an additional 3-4 g tolerance wich is why pilots can take 9 g's like its nothings(along with the g suit when your above 7 g's). Interestingly enough the blue angels fly with no g suits and they go up to 7.5 g's. The thunderbirds go up to 9 g's so they use g suits which make thier flying a little sloppier(notice how much closer and smoother the angels fly).

Any questions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AName
post Aug 16 2006, 01:45 AM
Post #12


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 454
Joined: 5-April 06
From: TCM 109.6 270 3.5
Member No.: 3,642



QUOTE(Archangel @ Aug 15 2006, 03:31 AM) [snapback]99166[/snapback]
Alot of it has to do with rate of change. Think of it this way, if you slowly pitch down it doesnt matter how fast you fall you wont become weightless. However if it is somewhat abrupt you will experience zero or negative g's.

Actually, you don't even need to pitch down as hard as you think. The first time I tried it out, i pushed to hard and everything in the right seat started heading up towards the ceiling. With a high pitch attitude, you'd be supressed how slowly you push down for 0g. It really depends on how high your original pitch is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cobzz
post Aug 21 2006, 04:23 AM
Post #13


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 7-July 05
Member No.: 1,765



In 1954, Colonel John Paul Stapp Ph.D., M.D., a US Air Force flight surgeon
and researcher, sustained the highest voluntary g-accelerations of 45 times
gravity. This work was done to determine the design standards for safety
harnesses and ejector seats being developed at the time to cope with the
newest generation of supersonic jets. Dr. Stapp achieved this by riding a
rocket sled to 634 miles per hour and accelerating to a halt in 1.4 seconds.

After the test, he had burst capilarries in his eyes, and many other affects.

Some others:
* on 13 July 1977 British racing driver David Purley survived a deceleration from 173 km/h to zero in a distance of about 0.66 m, enduring 180 g (*)
* the beak of the red-headed woodpecker hits the bark of a tree with an impact velocity of over 21 km/h, subjecting the bird's brain to a deceleration of approximately 10 g when its head snaps back (*)
* when 'jack-knifing' into the air to escape predators, the click beetle averages 400 g (*)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranger
post Aug 21 2006, 10:04 AM
Post #14


The Master Baiter
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 23-March 05
Member No.: 1,115



QUOTE(cobzz @ Aug 21 2006, 01:23 AM) [snapback]100199[/snapback]
In 1954, Colonel John Paul Stapp Ph.D., M.D., a US Air Force flight surgeon
and researcher, sustained the highest voluntary g-accelerations of 45 times
gravity. This work was done to determine the design standards for safety
harnesses and ejector seats being developed at the time to cope with the
newest generation of supersonic jets. Dr. Stapp achieved this by riding a
rocket sled to 634 miles per hour and accelerating to a halt in 1.4 seconds.

After the test, he had burst capilarries in his eyes, and many other affects.

Some others:
* on 13 July 1977 British racing driver David Purley survived a deceleration from 173 km/h to zero in a distance of about 0.66 m, enduring 180 g (*)
* the beak of the red-headed woodpecker hits the bark of a tree with an impact velocity of over 21 km/h, subjecting the bird's brain to a deceleration of approximately 10 g when its head snaps back (*)
* when 'jack-knifing' into the air to escape predators, the click beetle averages 400 g (*)


Interesting post. I think I remember reading an article in "Air & Space" about Col. Stapp. Could you even imagine abusing yourself like that so scientists could poke around on you afterward?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charliepapa
post Aug 21 2006, 10:52 AM
Post #15


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 716
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 2,779



QUOTE(Archangel @ Aug 16 2006, 12:43 AM) [snapback]99314[/snapback]
No 10 g's wont kill you. Maybe you should do some reasearch. There have been people who sustained 13 g's in centrifuges. Not only that a crash in nascar can generate 80-100 g's and plenty of people survive that. What affect g's have on your is directly related to how long your being affected by them. You may easily survive 100 g's for 1/00 of a second but easily die at 20 for 10 seconds. It's also a factor of negative vs positive. Positive g's won't usually kill you because its just a lack of oxygen to your brain that causes you to pass out, which is where the death from g's comes from. That is until you get to an amount that causes bodily damage, then the death comes from internal and external damage.

Now when it comes to negative g's its much easier to die because blood is rushing to your brain and blood vessesls will pop quite easily with anything over 7 negative g's if its sustained. I'd say 10 negative would kill most people.

Now the anti G-strain techniqe does give an additional 3-4 g tolerance wich is why pilots can take 9 g's like its nothings(along with the g suit when your above 7 g's). Interestingly enough the blue angels fly with no g suits and they go up to 7.5 g's. The thunderbirds go up to 9 g's so they use g suits which make thier flying a little sloppier(notice how much closer and smoother the angels fly).

Any questions?


Yeah, I meant a sustained period and with no G-Suits. Also, its negative G that pushes blood TO the brain, its positive that draws it AWAY. Thats gonna starve your brain...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Archangel
post Aug 21 2006, 06:12 PM
Post #16


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,047
Joined: 8-December 04
From: McChord AFB 62 AW
Member No.: 333



QUOTE(charliepapa @ Aug 21 2006, 07:52 AM) [snapback]100236[/snapback]
Yeah, I meant a sustained period and with no G-Suits. Also, its negative G that pushes blood TO the brain, its positive that draws it AWAY. Thats gonna starve your brain...


QUOTE(Archangel @ Aug 15 2006, 04:43 PM) [snapback]99314[/snapback]
Now when it comes to negative g's its much easier to die because blood is rushing to your brain and blood vessesls will pop quite easily with anything over 7 negative g's if its sustained. I'd say 10 negative would kill most people.


That was in my post. Aint it amazing how many g's people can take under extreme circumstances.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TAL1440
post Aug 21 2006, 09:32 PM
Post #17


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 7-August 05
Member No.: 1,894



Are G's from acceleration considered negative or positive?? I'd only assume positive?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bernoulli
post Aug 21 2006, 10:46 PM
Post #18


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 3,266
Joined: 11-December 04
From: (KLFT) Lafayette, LA
Member No.: 348



QUOTE(TAL1440 @ Aug 21 2006, 08:32 PM) [snapback]100333[/snapback]
Are G's from acceleration considered negative or positive?? I'd only assume positive?


A good rule of thumb:

Blood forced towards feet, positive G. Blood forced towards head, negative G. It all depends on the direction of the acceleration forces relative to the individual.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jorge
post Aug 23 2006, 08:53 PM
Post #19


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 584
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 849



QUOTE(charliepapa @ Aug 15 2006, 12:50 AM) [snapback]99181[/snapback]
You'll die about 10 G. Most people pass out at around 9, so if your unconcious you wont be doing your special breathing techniques... so yeah. Yead die. Just to add.. doing 5 G blinking hurts (from experience). I don't know how someone could go all the way up to 9.

You can't die from only 10 G's! Fighter pilots routinely pull more than this. Pilots at the red bull air race were pulling 13 G's at some points.
Also you have to be careful doing zero G maneuvers in a plane like a cessna 172 with a gravity fed fuel system. No gravity=no fuel going to the engine=bad day. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mpeterson
post Sep 3 2006, 02:01 PM
Post #20


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 465
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Member No.: 538



I probably shouldn't spout this since talldude is on these forums and hes a nark, but the arrow makes great for getting and staying 0G icon_smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

 
 
Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 05:21 AM

Home | Webmail | Forum | Random Video Generator | Link to us | Aircraft Fact Sheets | Help
Upload videos | Become a videographer | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact us | About Flightlevel350.com | Ad Choices

© 2004 - 2009 Flightlevel350.com
Aviation Videos - Airplane Videos - Loudest place on the web!