Home





Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Fs 2006
flight boffin
post Jan 21 2005, 04:03 AM
Post #1


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,475
Joined: 18-December 04
From: Durham Tees Valley Airport EGNV
Member No.: 393



Ok what would you like to see in Fs 2006. Personaly i would like wing and passenger views. Also a bigger selection of real airline colour schemes. And some airbus's. But FS in american and they never put airbus's on. I know you can downlaod them but wouldn't it be easier just to buy them with the package. :angry: :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Duffman
post Jan 21 2005, 05:46 AM
Post #2


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 117
Joined: 6-December 04
Member No.: 320



Cant wait for that to come out. I would like to see ground staff and more ground staff cars and bag carts and stuff. Plus more views aircaft and tower. Also be able to turn the tug when taxing out because the tugs not visible nor can u turn when backing out if you see what I mean. Other than that sort of stuff hope its a good game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EmiratesA330
post Jan 21 2005, 02:26 PM
Post #3


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 193
Joined: 20-December 04
Member No.: 399



people in the airport and on the ground as well as some airbus planes and virtual cabins! :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bernoulli
post Jan 21 2005, 02:49 PM
Post #4


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 3,266
Joined: 11-December 04
From: (KLFT) Lafayette, LA
Member No.: 348



Having dynamic 360 degree viewing capability. The ability to turn the flying over to the FO and get out of the chair to visit the cabin. Maybe even have passengers comment on the flight so far. If after a wild takeoff, show some green faced pax who have just puked or something...

Man, that would be some huge video overhead... :lol:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
flight boffin
post Jan 21 2005, 03:03 PM
Post #5


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,475
Joined: 18-December 04
From: Durham Tees Valley Airport EGNV
Member No.: 393



If this is all going to happen i think we will have to buy some new graphic cards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rjb4000
post Jan 21 2005, 04:56 PM
Post #6


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 2,718
Joined: 13-December 04
From: Rhode Island / Daytona Beach, FL / Washington, DC
Member No.: 365



lol thats pretty funny..

what i want is the ATC to be correct... they should concentrate only on ATC for 2 years and really perfect it and then we could actually learn somthing from fs rather than bs'ing around
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rjb4000
post Jan 21 2005, 06:14 PM
Post #7


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 2,718
Joined: 13-December 04
From: Rhode Island / Daytona Beach, FL / Washington, DC
Member No.: 365



QUOTE(Duffman @ Jan 21 2005, 04:46 AM)
nor can u turn when backing out if you see what I mean.

sure you can.. you can pushback and tow at adjustable speeds while controlling the direction with the twist axis of the joystick... you just need the right tools
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MBRAND
post Jan 21 2005, 07:07 PM
Post #8


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 21-January 05
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 634



First may I say hi to everyone (I'm new) icon_razz.gif

I'd like to see ATC give airspeed instructions to all AI Aircraft and users (this would be extremely useful on approach) Also, when it's raining aircraft should blow up spray off the runway.

and the main thing........microsoft should bring back parallel runway usage (like in FS2002) where AI could cross a runway to takeoff on another, it's extremely difficult in FS2004 (messed with AFCAD for hours on end) ATC won't take any notice.

:D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
unit
post Jan 21 2005, 07:39 PM
Post #9


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 1-January 05
Member No.: 483



QUOTE(flight boffin @ Jan 21 2005, 11:03 AM)
If this is all going to happen i think we will have to buy some new graphic cards.

Many people overlook that Microsoft has always created an inefficient graphics engine for all of its Flight Simulator titles. If they create an engine with intructions that utilize the potential of top of the line video cards, I guarantee you will see a great improvement in mesh, scenery, water, etc. Take Far Cry for instance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
B22EL
post Jan 21 2005, 08:54 PM
Post #10


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 24-December 04
From: Knoxville, TN (KTYS)
Member No.: 430



this may have been already pointed out, but I'd like to see realistic looking scenery, not a satellite snap shot of the earth and then buildings, trees,and roads added in, I'd like it to be all just models and textures, also I'd really love to see moving objects on the grounds, ex. cars on the freeways, pedestrians in downtown, and more details to the airport, like where you can get out of your plane and go for a walk around the terminal and or nearby town.

LOL prob take a jumbo computer for that, but it would be neat as crap. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thesecondredbaro...
post Jan 21 2005, 10:30 PM
Post #11


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 12-January 05
Member No.: 563



i agree that there should be more ground support features. like, in order to gas up, you gotta go to the pump, ya know what i mean? "as real as it gets" means that. you cant just fuel up a 747 in midair. but, wait a minute. wouldnt it be cool if fs contains tankers, where you can mate up in midair and refuel? that would be the bomb.
also, more realistic sceneries would be a plus, though i recently looked back at my old cd's, and saw fs for win 98. popped it in, and man, it was horrible! they sure did come a long way.
wat about the concorde? they should bring it back. it would be the bomb.
also, does anyone know if you can actually use ground support vehicles in fs04? i'd be dying to know how.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
B22EL
post Jan 22 2005, 01:02 PM
Post #12


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 24-December 04
From: Knoxville, TN (KTYS)
Member No.: 430



ALSO: one of the biggest things that kicks the crap out of me in FS2004 is that fact that there is no realistic ammount of traffic, I think that traffic should be increased 200% what it is in 2004 at full setting, that would get the full effect, there are programs on the side that allow you to do this but I cant seem to find one I can work with...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
flight boffin
post Jan 22 2005, 01:04 PM
Post #13


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,475
Joined: 18-December 04
From: Durham Tees Valley Airport EGNV
Member No.: 393



I can't get ultimate traffic to work. Its pants. The graphics of the extra aircraft are pants too icon_sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LEVT
post Jan 22 2005, 02:34 PM
Post #14


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 986
Joined: 14-September 04
From: Vitoria-Gasteiz, (LEVT)
Member No.: 44



Ooops, I have to buy a new graphic card and some tones of RAM...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sklzlm
post Jan 22 2005, 04:10 PM
Post #15





Guests






I would like to see a few things in a newer flight simulator, such as emergency landings and more randomized failures. I would also like to see ATC warn you about restricted airspace.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
punas1
post Jan 22 2005, 05:12 PM
Post #16


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 403



Let's not give those smart developers at Microsoft anymore ideas. Let em all step down and sell there stock like the Bill Gates man.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SEXYWINGMAN04
post Jan 22 2005, 11:25 PM
Post #17


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 5-December 04
Member No.: 312



Actually, all I want is a more computer friendly version... an included 757 would be nice and real liveries...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bulnes
post Jan 25 2005, 11:12 AM
Post #18


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 11-January 05
Member No.: 549



QUOTE(rjb4000 @ Jan 21 2005, 12:56 PM)
lol thats pretty funny..

what i want is the ATC to be correct... they should concentrate only on ATC for 2 years and really perfect it and then we could actually learn somthing from fs rather than bs'ing around

Hit the nail on the head. The big step should be ATC. I would appreciate more realistic ATC chatter with a greater number of options. As far as the rest of the stuff I´m reading everything is more or less represented in commercial addons. Ultimate Traffic works wonderfully for me. I don´t see why some of you are having trouble with it. And yes the more we ask of FS the more demanding the hardware requirements will be.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
boeing fan
post Jan 25 2005, 03:09 PM
Post #19


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 20-October 04
Member No.: 135



O.K FOR FS2006 THERE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO ADD CONSIDERATION TO THE AIR SO WHEN IT'S HAZY YOU HAVE VAPOR TRAILS COMING OF THE WINGS ON TAKE OFF, THAT WOULD BE SO SO COOL! ;) :D
DON'T YOU THINK?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LEVT
post Jan 25 2005, 03:39 PM
Post #20


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 986
Joined: 14-September 04
From: Vitoria-Gasteiz, (LEVT)
Member No.: 44



boeing_fan, please, would you mind writing normal?? I mean, not with CAPITALS. Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

 
 
Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 07:01 PM

Home | Webmail | Forum | Random Video Generator | Link to us | Aircraft Fact Sheets | Help
Upload videos | Become a videographer | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact us | About Flightlevel350.com | Ad Choices

© 2004 - 2009 Flightlevel350.com
Aviation Videos - Airplane Videos - Loudest place on the web!