|
| |
|
  |
Contact or Visual |
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2005, 07:51 PM
|

Out of control Frenchman
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 6-March 05
From: (ZZZZ) The blue planet
Member No.: 992

|
Although I keep searching in vain the difference, I cannot, for the life of me, explain the finer point between the two.
It almost looks like as if a contact approach is a visual but without the visual of the destination.
Of course, nowadays, if one was to request a contact approach, most likely we are going to either get a blank or an instantaneous "unable" from the controller; who is just as puzzled as me regarding what the hell is it that I want. The fact that he/she probably can't remember if standard traffic separation has to be maintained is another story; needless to say, if one was to raise such a request, the whole ARTCC would scramble to go find a copy of the ops manual 6715-blablabla, to fetch an answer to the separation issue.
Anyhow, can someone please finally lift the veil off of this obscure medieval procedure? There is no such thing as too long of an answer!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2005, 10:43 PM
|

F-22 Member
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,858
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CYYC)
Member No.: 980

|
QUOTE(Bernoulli) Just so those students reading this will have no misunderstanding, ATC will never offer, suggest, or assign the contact approach, even if conditions and circumstances warrant one. You have to request it when you find yourself in a pinch, or like Hawker said, when convenient to you if you happen to hold an IFR ticket and don't want to shoot the full or vectored published approach.
ah! I see someone didn't read the link.  lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2005, 11:05 PM
|

Space Shuttle Member
     
Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 3,266
Joined: 11-December 04
From: (KLFT) Lafayette, LA
Member No.: 348

|
QUOTE(flyingcanuck) QUOTE(Bernoulli) Just so those students reading this will have no misunderstanding, ATC will never offer, suggest, or assign the contact approach, even if conditions and circumstances warrant one. You have to request it when you find yourself in a pinch, or like Hawker said, when convenient to you if you happen to hold an IFR ticket and don't want to shoot the full or vectored published approach.
ah! I see someone didn't read the link.  lol
My appologies Canuck! I'm busted. You provided a great link explaining everything. Maybe I should have actually READ them before spouting off comments!
Thanks for doing the legwork and providing a good link! I promise to read more thoroughly in the future....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 9 2005, 08:57 PM
|

The Rant Master
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,225
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Member No.: 1,333

|
Hey Bernoulli / Canuck: Kudos to both of you! Never a bad idea to know the rules and when/where/why to employ what the rules allow. And like my Bud, Ranger, said, during a visual approach you have to keep something in sight -- runway or airplane. Yeah, you can get a visual approach clearance without seeing the runway, if you tell the controller you see the aircraft you're following. BUT -- it will then be YOUR responsibility (not the controller's) to maintain aircraft separation.
I also agree that if you request a contact approach, 99% of the time the controller will grant it, if he/she can.
AirRabbit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 9 2005, 09:47 PM
|

F-22 Member
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,858
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CYYC)
Member No.: 980

|
QUOTE(Bernoulli) QUOTE(flyingcanuck) QUOTE(Bernoulli) Just so those students reading this will have no misunderstanding, ATC will never offer, suggest, or assign the contact approach, even if conditions and circumstances warrant one. You have to request it when you find yourself in a pinch, or like Hawker said, when convenient to you if you happen to hold an IFR ticket and don't want to shoot the full or vectored published approach.
ah! I see someone didn't read the link.  lol
My appologies Canuck! I'm busted. You provided a great link explaining everything. Maybe I should have actually READ them before spouting off comments!
Thanks for doing the legwork and providing a good link! I promise to read more thoroughly in the future....
actually, I have to admit that I'm a little hipocritical on this one. I only read links that interest me and judging by the fact that you're a pilot, it probably didn't interest you. The link was a little long as well; but it always feels nice to get someone to apologize to you. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|