|
| |
Irresponsible ? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2006, 05:08 PM
|

Airbus 380 Member
    
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 21-March 05
From: KCCB
Member No.: 1,097

|
QUOTE(c150student @ Oct 11 2006, 01:36 PM) [snapback]105884[/snapback] I guess. But if he had an engine failure then things could all go to pot then. I suppose because it wasnt above an urban area it was better than flying +2 knots above stalling speed above people. Leaves little room for error, especially since the runway was long enough for him to land normally. I guess I was initially shocked (or maybe just jealous hehe) You are right, he leaves little room for error, but that's the nature of the landing that he's performing. It's a low, shallow descent, pull the power, touch down as soon as possible and apply brakes. It looked to me like he might have actually overshot the exit a little bit, and turned back for it just for appearances though... Sometimes it's necessary to practice things that aren't necessarily completely safe, in order to be safe when you're doing them in the case of a real emergency, or just in the case that you actually are landing at a short runway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 03:22 PM
|

Saab 340 Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 26-June 06
From: Long Island NY, KFRG KJFK KISP KHWV KFOK KLGA, North shore Sound Beach
Member No.: 3,968

|
But if they were using that as the active runway, and didnt have a left or right, Larger aircraft would be holding shor there at the first taxiway, so the second or more would make more sense. no one was holding short in that video Cool landing though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 03:38 PM
|
Boeing 747 Member
   
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 16-January 06
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 2,890

|
QUOTE(learguy @ Oct 12 2006, 12:13 PM) [snapback]105985[/snapback] Or being on short final, 132kts Vref, while watching a C-172 roll past ANOTHER high-speed turnoff. After twice being told we're on short final by the tower. Been in that exact same position! Both of us in the cockpit say "C'mon man, do some of that pilot #$#@% and get off the runway!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 06:13 PM
|

Airbus 380 Member
    
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 21-March 05
From: KCCB
Member No.: 1,097

|
QUOTE(c150student @ Oct 12 2006, 01:17 PM) [snapback]106001[/snapback] haha, I get a bit like that if I know someone is behind me on final, but I'm always told to 'ignore' them, and concentrate on my flying and my control of the aircraft, which I guess is most important. However, I've never been holding up anything larger than a twin engine prop. That said, I dont think I actually held them up anyway. Was just worried about doing so. You want to know what's more irritating than a go around because of a 172 not clearing the runway? How about a runway closure due to a 172 toppling over because of excessive speed in a turn off? Or a taxiway collision with another aircraft? Or a wing clipping a beacon, or the like? Never, ever rush off of a runway because of an aircraft behind you. That is why God gave pilots go arounds. As annoying as it may be, it is necessary at times. Whoever is telling you to ignore them and concentrate on your flying and your control of the aircraft is very, very correct. And if you know that there will be excessive amounts of 737s and A320s landing at that particular time, perhaps you should check out a different airfield to practice your landings. Man, I wish I could remember where, but just the other day I read about a ruling that the FAA just handed down to a CFI, who while flying with a student and practicing landings, had to make a go around because of an aircraft slow to get off of the runway. The CFI quickly took control of the aircraft, altered course towards the slower aircraft, and buzzed the slow plane within a distance that was said to have been between 35-100 ft. Unfortunately for the CFI, the slower aircraft was a PPL checkride, complete with FAA examiner and everything. A few phone calls, and an FAA hearing later, the CFIs license and ratings are suspended, and he has no job for either six months or a year, I can't remember which.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|