|
| |
|
  |
Best Fighter Of The Century, It has to have been or is operational. No X-planes. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2006, 10:45 PM
|
Space Shuttle Member
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 689
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Miami, Florida
Member No.: 3,509

|
I'm just wondering: What are the criteria for naming this "Best Fighter"? Number of kills? What about kills for losses? Number of aircraft made? Service life? Ability to handle multiple mission tasks? War Record?
The P-51 Mustang. She had 19 klls for each loss (against the Luftwaffe, that's pretty d*mn good) destroying 4850 aircraft Europe There were 14, 819 made for the US Army. They were used as dive-bombers, bomber escorts, ground-attackers, interceptors, for photo-recon missions, trainers, transports (with a jump-seat), and after the war, high performance racers.
The F6F Hellcat with 5154 kills by the Navy and Marine Corps in WWII. It had the highest kill/loss ratio of all fighters of all services in the War. She was the plane that won the Pacific away from the Japanese Navy.
The F-86 Sabre. The fighting in the valleys and over the Yalu in Korea...shooting down 810 enemy fighters, 792 of them MiG 15's. In three years of fighting, she scored a 12-1 kill ratio against some of the best pilots the Communist Bloc could produce.
There's still the SPAD, Sopwith Camel, Messerschmitt 109, Focke-Wulfe 190, Mitsubishi Zero, F-4 Phantom II, MiG-21, F-18 Hornet, MiG-3, Fokker Triplane...Let's pull them all out and see what we get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2 2006, 11:33 AM
|
Saab 340 Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 82
Joined: 26-December 05
From: Santa Monica, CA, USA
Member No.: 2,744

|
Judging by performance, it is obviously the F-22. This is the most advanced fighter plane of all time(albeit, also the most expensive). It is amazing to me that many of the figures are still classified. The air force just says a 60000+ ft. service ceiliing and Paul Metz, the chief test pilot, says it can "easily go over 1600 mph"(with more thrust than the Blackbird, I don't doubt it might be able to nudge 2000 mph). It also has thrust vectoring and will out-maneuver any plane out there. Oh yeah, and don't forget stealth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 09:33 AM
|
Space Shuttle Member
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,826
Joined: 10-June 05
From: Farnborough, Hampshire, UK (FAB/EGLF, LGW/EGKK, LHR/EGLL)
Member No.: 1,640

|
IMO, It's the Spitfire, first piston to break the 300MPH barrier, and generally a ledgend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2006, 03:19 AM
|
Space Shuttle Member
     
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 689
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Miami, Florida
Member No.: 3,509

|
Didn't the Hawker Hurricane shoot down a majority of the planes claimed by the RAF (1,593 out of 2,739 total claimed) in the Battle of Britain? I mean, she was the backbone of the RAF during the battle of France and the Battle of Britain. The first allied ace flew a Hurricane.
Not to impugn the fine and glorious name of the Spitfire, which I believe IS one of the best fighters ever, but let's not forget her older sister. I've a couple of funny stories of the hurricane from one of my aunts, who as a girl, was sent to Dover before the blitz. I've always thought that men who went to fight Germans armed with a fighter made partly of linen had some real bal-...uh...guts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 05:02 PM
|
Cessna 152 Member

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 23-April 06
Member No.: 3,758

|
Thatīs hard to choose, but among the WW2 fighters I would stick to the Tempest, Spitfire or P-47. I think the war propaganda placed the P-51 on a place it doesnīt belong, it really helped since it could fly over Germany, but thatīs all. S!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 27 2006, 12:51 PM
|
Boeing 737 Member
  
Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 4-September 05
Member No.: 2,054

|
QUOTE(Bruno @ Apr 23 2006, 02:01 PM) [snapback]81252[/snapback] Thatīs hard to choose, but among the WW2 fighters I would stick to the Tempest, Spitfire or P-47. I think the war propaganda placed the P-51 on a place it doesnīt belong, it really helped since it could fly over Germany, but thatīs all. S!  You make it sound like flying to Germany was a normal occurance before the P-51. For the bombers, maybe. When the Mustang was re-introduced with the Rolls-Royce engine, it completly revolutionized the bombing campaign over Germany. Now, the B-17's had an escort who could not only fly in with them, they could also make the trip home as well. To say the P-51 has been placed on a pedistal it dosen't belong, is pure rubbish, sir. To pick a single fighter is far too hard for me. Pre modern era: P-51 Mustang Modern era: F-15 Eagle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 05:06 PM
|
Cessna 152 Member

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 23-April 06
Member No.: 3,758

|
QUOTE(Sapper @ Apr 27 2006, 01:51 PM) [snapback]82000[/snapback] You make it sound like flying to Germany was a normal occurance before the P-51. For the bombers, maybe. When the Mustang was re-introduced with the Rolls-Royce engine, it completly revolutionized the bombing campaign over Germany. Now, the B-17's had an escort who could not only fly in with them, they could also make the trip home as well. To say the P-51 has been placed on a pedistal it dosen't belong, is pure rubbish, sir.
To pick a single fighter is far too hard for me.
Pre modern era: P-51 Mustang Modern era: F-15 Eagle My point is the P-51 did a great job, but if you stop and compare it to the other fighters youīll see it was not that good. S!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
|
|
|