Home





Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Squawk Codes
peter
post May 22 2007, 08:38 PM
Post #1


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 18-December 05
From: St. Paul, MN
Member No.: 2,685



I have heard the term squawk many times on my scanner and fs. I am thoroughly confused what they mean so if anyone could clarify, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glnflwrs
post May 22 2007, 09:19 PM
Post #2


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 2,846
Joined: 5-June 05
From: Hesperia, CA USA (L26)
Member No.: 1,610



Most aircraft have a radar transponder installed. A transponder is required for instrument flight. The transponder responds to ATC radar signals and it has four dials on the front that can be set to a number from 0 through 9. ATC will instruct a pilot to Squawk 0465, for instance, and the pilot will dial that number into the four dials on his transponder. The radar blip on the ATC's radar for that airplane will then show the number 0465 directly under the blip. There is also a button in the plane on the transponder labeled IDENT. When instructed, the pilot will squawk a code and push the IDENT button which makes the blip for his plane really bright on ATC's radar screen.

There are special codes for hijack, emergencies, loss of radios, etc. that a pilot can squawk. ATC sees these codes and acts accordingly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bernoulli
post May 22 2007, 11:02 PM
Post #3


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 3,266
Joined: 11-December 04
From: (KLFT) Lafayette, LA
Member No.: 348



Just some examples of what Glenn is referring to:

7700 Emergency
7600 Lost communications
7500 Hijack
1200 VFR (and not likely in contact with ATC)

But normally, local ATC (when contacted and VFR) will assign you a squawk code starting with a zero depending where you are. But when you get into "the system" for VFR flight following with center or a TRACON, you will get assigned something in their own designated block of codes.

I once received VFR flight following with Jacksonville Center on my way to Miami and was assigned a transponder code of something like 4657. Soon after, the controller announced that he had run out of transponder codes for new IFR flights and informed us VFR guys that he would have to terminate VFR flight following with all of us to free up the codes. I must confess that this was a first for me. I considered picking up an IFR, but figured the guy was seriously overloaded already, so I went on my merry way in beautiful weather until entering the Miami sector where I contacted the appropriate Miami Center controller.

First time for everything....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AName
post May 22 2007, 11:40 PM
Post #4


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 454
Joined: 5-April 06
From: TCM 109.6 270 3.5
Member No.: 3,642



QUOTE(glnflwrs @ May 22 2007, 06:19 PM) [snapback]117382[/snapback]
[...] it has four dials on the front that can be set to a number from 0 through 9.

By 9, you do of course mean 7, right? icon_wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glnflwrs
post May 23 2007, 12:48 AM
Post #5


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: FL350 CREW
Posts: 2,846
Joined: 5-June 05
From: Hesperia, CA USA (L26)
Member No.: 1,610



Yeah, that completely escaped me. It is 7. icon_redface.gif

LOL ! ! icon_thumright.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
klm_city_hopper
post May 23 2007, 02:47 AM
Post #6


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,684
Joined: 31-January 06
Member No.: 3,004



So, when a controller gives a code, he or she can then assign the callsign to the blob, or any other information?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
niko_future_pilo...
post May 23 2007, 03:01 AM
Post #7


cranky member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 777
Joined: 3-March 05
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 952



QUOTE(bernoulli @ May 23 2007, 05:02 AM) [snapback]117385[/snapback]
7500 Hijack



hum... isn't declaring a hijack supposed to be stealth? you'd think the terrorists know what the code is by now... how discreetly can you type in 7500?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AName
post May 23 2007, 04:43 AM
Post #8


Airbus 380 Member
*****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 454
Joined: 5-April 06
From: TCM 109.6 270 3.5
Member No.: 3,642



QUOTE(niko_future_pilot @ May 23 2007, 12:01 AM) [snapback]117397[/snapback]
hum... isn't declaring a hijack supposed to be stealth? you'd think the terrorists know what the code is by now... how discreetly can you type in 7500?

Well, you're just learning about it now and you frequently visit an aviation forum, so the chance of a common terrorist knowing is pretty slim. Even assuming they do know, it gets pretty busy in a cockpit and pilots can be pretty sneaky people ("Hey Mr. Terroist, isn't that Bob Barker on the wing?" punch in 7500 while he looks, "Oh, nevermind. I must be seeing things..."). The system isn't foolproof, but it's just another possible option in a bad situation.

I did ask a question similar to this way back in my PPL ground days and the assuring CFI said that line pilots are taught other ways to get the message across that are not publicly known (I'm not sure how accurate this statement is though).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Piltdown Man
post May 23 2007, 07:35 AM
Post #9


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,037
Joined: 9-April 07
From: Wor Yerm
Member No.: 5,208



QUOTE(klm_city_hopper @ May 23 2007, 07:47 AM) [snapback]117396[/snapback]
So, when a controller gives a code, he or she can then assign the callsign to the blob, or any other information?


Yes and No. On the modern Mode S transponders, you also put in your callsign. However, if that is not forthcoming I'm sure that ATC can put one in manually. Against the "Blob", the ATC software can then attach data tags such as destination, route and requested level (ie. complete flight plan data). But don't forget that we also transmit our flight level as well as our squawk code. I also believe that we have the ability to receive ATC clearances via Mode S and in return, transmit the values set on the FMP so that they can see their clearance has been correctly received. However, these bits are not enabled/implemented in any of our aircraft (yet!).

PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ghostrider
post May 23 2007, 10:41 AM
Post #10


Boeing 747 Member
****

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 6-March 06
From: Fresno / Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 3,330



Just because there are hijackers doesn't mean they've infiltrated the cockpit. They could be banging on the door or holding hostages giving the pilots a chance to squawk 7500.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peter
post May 23 2007, 04:33 PM
Post #11


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 18-December 05
From: St. Paul, MN
Member No.: 2,685



Thank you everyone, I understand it now. Its interesting how the ATC system has been set up, making it pretty easy to understand and use.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
milehigheric
post May 25 2007, 04:23 AM
Post #12


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,083
Joined: 17-October 05
From: Australia, YBCG
Member No.: 2,317



Just to make things more difficult to us pilots, the Australian airspace is implementing an ADS-B system (Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast). The new system is an air to ground and air to air surveillance system. In some areas of Australia this new system is actually replacing the tradition radar environment. This new technology is a great leap for Australian airspace but no-doubt it will create a lot of confusion amongst both veteran and student pilots...

If you feel like a read, the full document is available on the CASA website as a PDF. Seeing as I am a nice bloke I will even link it for you. Linky
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
7500hijack!
post Oct 29 2008, 12:21 AM
Post #13


Cessna 152 Member
*

Group: Newbies
Posts: 1
Joined: 29-October 08
Member No.: 8,227



auctually. your wrong. the squawk codes are 0-7. they dont use 8 or 9. and no. it does not make it "bright" on their SCOPE. its called a "MODE C TRANSPONDER" mainly, every aircraft has one, the older ones dont, which is why you use visual separation from the ones who do not. the MODE C TRANSPONDER lets an air traffic controller see your plane at your altitude, at your heading, at your speed, your airline, flight number. IT DOES NOT SHOW SQUAWK CODE. i dont know where you got your information from but it is almost completely wrong. i am an AT-CTI student so i'm pretty familiar with this. since i just took my mid term on it this morning. you need more information....come to me. this is all easy and fresh in my head...and yes, there are 3 codes for emergencies. 7500- hijack. 7600-radio failure, 7700- general emergency.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GolfrGuy7
post Oct 29 2008, 07:40 AM
Post #14


Saab 340 Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 16-May 06
From: KROA
Member No.: 3,945



QUOTE(7500hijack! @ Oct 29 2008, 12:21 AM) [snapback]128827[/snapback]
auctually. your wrong. the squawk codes are 0-7. they dont use 8 or 9. and no. it does not make it "bright" on their SCOPE. its called a "MODE C TRANSPONDER" mainly, every aircraft has one, the older ones dont, which is why you use visual separation from the ones who do not. the MODE C TRANSPONDER lets an air traffic controller see your plane at your altitude, at your heading, at your speed, your airline, flight number. IT DOES NOT SHOW SQUAWK CODE. i dont know where you got your information from but it is almost completely wrong. i am an AT-CTI student so i'm pretty familiar with this. since i just took my mid term on it this morning. you need more information....come to me. this is all easy and fresh in my head...and yes, there are 3 codes for emergencies. 7500- hijack. 7600-radio failure, 7700- general emergency.


Someone already cleared up the 8 and 9 thing. And yes the IDENT button will make the blip brighter on ATC radar screens for a certain amount of time. I'm pretty sure a mode C transponder only has altitude encoding.. ATC can get your heading and speed from their radar even if you don't have mode C. Also, I'm about 99.9% sure it does show your squawk. Think about that for a second.. if it didn't show your squawk code then why the hell would you need to put one in? Maybe your confused with mode S? Mode S, as said before, will transmit callsigns and other flight data.

BTW, the people here are all really friendly and knowledgeable pilots. Most of them have way more experience than you (me as well), so you might not want to try to come in here and act like you know it all. Cause you don't. None of us know it all.. but we all can learn something from each other here. So I suggest you throttle back on the attitude.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Piltdown Man
post Oct 29 2008, 12:28 PM
Post #15


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,037
Joined: 9-April 07
From: Wor Yerm
Member No.: 5,208



Let's get this one cleared up. Us Civilians have three active modes available. Mode A is where we transmit a four digit code, Mode C transmits our code and our altitude (referenced to 1013.2 Hpa (29.92 ins)) and Mode S transmit codes, our levels, our callsign, settings from our Flight Mode Panel, contents of Captains wallet etc... In addition to all that, we can also temporarily transmit an extra On/Off status known as an "Ident" so that a controller can positively verify who they are speaking to. How the "ident" is displayed depends on the radar display systems. Some make the "blobs" brighter, some put a ring around the target, others overlay symbols.

7500hijack: I don't think you have been listening properly. Mode C does not show "your heading, at your speed, your airline, flight number" because this is not transmitted. This data is generated from the raw radar and other feeds by various sub-systems and added to the data stream before it gets to the controller's display. Also, your assumptions regarding separation are also a bit flaky. Most Control Centres have primary as well as secondary radar feeds and keep as many dots (primary and secondary) as they can from bumping into each other. Also not all aircraft have transponders because they don't have to. It all depends on local rules and the class of airspace they fly in. And if I need more information, you will have to forgive me, but I won't be coming to you.

As an aside, the squawk codes allocated depend on the area you are flying in. In Western Europe, we are given a code and rarely have to change it if we stay inside controlled airspace. These codes are generated by various flight panning systems around Europe and are often destination dependent. But as soon as we leave controlled airspace the agency who then handles us allocates a code from a block they have available. For example, London Military in the East give codes starting 615, Teesside's codes start 70. The reason for this is so that other controllers can see who is handling a particular blob just by the transponder code.

Personally, it don't think it really matters that the bad guys know what the emergency transponder codes are. We've all lost when it gets to that point.

PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
c150student
post Oct 29 2008, 02:56 PM
Post #16


Space Shuttle Member
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,448
Joined: 16-January 06
From: SE United Kingdom
Member No.: 2,891



QUOTE(7500hijack! @ Oct 29 2008, 04:21 AM) [snapback]128827[/snapback]
auctually. your wrong. the squawk codes are 0-7. they dont use 8 or 9. and no. it does not make it "bright" on their SCOPE. its called a "MODE C TRANSPONDER" mainly, every aircraft has one, the older ones dont, which is why you use visual separation from the ones who do not. the MODE C TRANSPONDER lets an air traffic controller see your plane at your altitude, at your heading, at your speed, your airline, flight number. IT DOES NOT SHOW SQUAWK CODE. i dont know where you got your information from but it is almost completely wrong. i am an AT-CTI student so i'm pretty familiar with this. since i just took my mid term on it this morning. you need more information....come to me. this is all easy and fresh in my head...and yes, there are 3 codes for emergencies. 7500- hijack. 7600-radio failure, 7700- general emergency.


Please, do tell me more. I find these experienced pilots completely useless (what do they know) and would love for you to pass more of your extensive knowledge onto me, who is nothing more than a rookie PPL. And perhaps if you hadnt been so quick to see a mistake and try and show off by correting it, you'd have seen that it had already been corrected. Welcome, by the way.

And just to add something of relevance to this post, in the UK, the conspicuity code is 7000 as opposed to 1200 as it is in the states. I know some flights get their own squawks that remain with them for pretty much the whole flight, unless asked to change specifically by the controller.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranger
post Oct 29 2008, 04:07 PM
Post #17


The Master Baiter
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 23-March 05
Member No.: 1,115



QUOTE(GolfrGuy7 @ Oct 29 2008, 04:40 AM) [snapback]128838[/snapback]
None of us know it all.


A couple of us do. Well, most things. OK, maybe just a lot.

What does 7600 mean again?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranger
post Oct 29 2008, 04:15 PM
Post #18


The Master Baiter
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 23-March 05
Member No.: 1,115



QUOTE(milehigheric @ May 25 2007, 01:23 AM) [snapback]117518[/snapback]
Just to make things more difficult to us pilots, the Australian airspace is implementing an ADS-B system (Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast). The new system is an air to ground and air to air surveillance system. In some areas of Australia this new system is actually replacing the tradition radar environment. This new technology is a great leap for Australian airspace but no-doubt it will create a lot of confusion amongst both veteran and student pilots...

If you feel like a read, the full document is available on the CASA website as a PDF. Seeing as I am a nice bloke I will even link it for you. Linky


Nope, ADS is a wonderful thing. And it's pretty simple to use. It's part of the Future Air Navigation System or FANS. There are a great many equipment requirements as well as training. But once the money is spent and the system is operational, it's a snap from the crew point of view. As far as it's impact on student pilots, unless the Aussie government has gone completely off the deep end, the impact should be zero. It's close to cost prohibitive for the individual aircraft owner.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AirRabbit
post Oct 30 2008, 01:28 PM
Post #19


The Rant Master
******

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 1,225
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Member No.: 1,333



Just wondering here ... is it a generational thing or have the English language gurus made a change that I'm not clued into yet?

I always thought that the word, “YOUR” was an adjective that meant “belonging to you,” and the contraction, “YOU'RE,” meant “YOU ARE,” followed by what it was that you were accused of being (or were suspected or questioned of doing or becoming), as in “YOU’RE WRONG.” The use of this colloquial contraction seems to have been replaced with the use of the adjective ... or it would seem so ... as in the use of the newer colloquialism, "my bad," or "your bad," meaning either I have erred or you have. Is it now legitimate to use the adjective, "YOUR," in conjunction with the word, "WRONG" (as used in this thread "YOUR WRONG"), to indicate an opinion that a statement or position is (or was) an error committed by the accused person - much as one would have used the newer colloquialism, "YOUR BAD?"

I certainly don’t want the masses to be bereft of understanding whether or not the Rant Master still “HAS GAME!”
icon_thumright.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
USMCmech
post Oct 30 2008, 02:37 PM
Post #20


Boeing 737 Member
***

Group: Full Access Members
Posts: 152
Joined: 24-July 05
From: San Antonio TX
Member No.: 1,831



QUOTE(glnflwrs @ May 22 2007, 09:48 PM) [snapback]117394[/snapback]
Yeah, that completely escaped me. It is 7. icon_redface.gif



The reason that the code only uses 0-7 is the very low power of the ATC computers back in the late 50s (?) when the transponder was introduced.

As with many things in aviation it hasn't changed simply because it dosen't really need to.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

 
 
Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 07:16 AM

Home | Webmail | Forum | Random Video Generator | Link to us | Aircraft Fact Sheets | Help
Upload videos | Become a videographer | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact us | About Flightlevel350.com | Ad Choices

© 2004 - 2009 Flightlevel350.com
Aviation Videos - Airplane Videos - Loudest place on the web!